The Robo-Advisor concept is relatively new to
the mainstream investment crowd. The product is applicable across many
demographics spanning different age, wealth, income, and financial goal
categories. In essence, Robo-Advisors are to the advisory business what ETF’s
are to the fund business.* In other words, the product is a disruption to the
traditional asset management industry and is worthy of consideration for your
investment plan.
To begin, a Robo-Advisor is a passive investment management strategy that employs ETF’s to build a portfolio based on Modern
Portfolio Theory (MPT). MPT originated from the research of Harry Markowitz.
His paper’s premise suggest that investors can tailor a portfolio of
investments based on their risk tolerance, therefore implying that assuming
some risk is an inevitable part of investing. While risk is inevitable, that
risk can be mitigated through diversifying one’s holdings in a portfolio.
Markowitz’s work implies that building an efficient portfolio is best achieved
through designing the right blend of asset classes based on one’s risk
tolerance. A Robo-Advisor utilizes this method in building a portfolio of
assets for its clients.
Currently, ETF’s are the most cost-effective
vehicle for the general investment public to use when gaining broad asset class
exposure. When constructing a portfolio for a client a Robo-Advisor uses a
series of questions that will be filtered through an algorithm ultimately
placing that client at some point along the efficient frontier which maximizes
an investor’s return for accepted risk. For example, according to MPT, clients
that are more risk averse will have to accept less expected return. Conversely,
those willing to take on more expected risk should be rewarded with more
potential return.
Depending on the asset allocation mix from
the Robo-Advisor, clients in the former risk profile can expect to have their
portfolio allocated to asset classes defined as less-risky, whereas investors
fitting the profile in the latter risk category will be invested in asset
classes where more risk has been assumed historically.
Generally speaking, one can think of bonds as
a less risky asset class than stocks based on past performance. However, within
each broad asset class an advisor can target more specific investment niches.
For example, Emerging Market Debt is a type of bond or fixed income product but
can exhibit more of an equity-like risk and return profile based on the uncertainty
assumed with exposure to a less politically and economically stable country.
Additionally, an ETF specializing in US Utility stocks can behave more like a
bond due to interest rate sensitivity for utility companies and the generally
attractive yield from such investments.
Hopefully this information can help shed some
light on the Robo-Advisor product and how it can be beneficial to incorporate
in your investment planning. As always, please do not hesitate to ask any
questions. Thanks for reading.
JD
*Please refer to my post here entitled
“What You Should Know About ETF's?” in order to learn about this product if needed.
Comments
Post a Comment